Language Arts 9 Functional
Writing Rubric
|
CONTENT: Ideas &
organization of the topic are effective; the purpose of the assignment is
fulfilled with complete and appropriate information; the tone is appropriate
for a business letter and awareness of audience is evident. |
CONTENT MANAGEMENT: Words
and expressions are used accurately and effectively; sentence structure,
usage, and mechanics (spelling, punctuation) are controlled; the format of a
business letter and envelope are consistently applied. |
Meets the standard of Excellence 5 |
Ideas are well-developed
& organization of the topic is clear & effective. Complete info. is
presented, and this info. is enhanced by precise & appropriate details
that effectively fulfill the purpose of the assignment. A tone appropriate
for the addressee is clearly and effectively maintained. |
Words and expressions
used are consistently accurate and effective. The writing demonstrates
confident and consistent control of sentence structure, usage, and mechanics.
The letter and envelope are essentially free from format errors. |
Approaches the Standard of Excellence 4 |
The ideas are generally
well-developed and organization of the topic is generally effective. Complete
information is presented, and this information is substantiated by appropriate
details that fulfill the purpose of the assignment. A tone appropriate for
the addressee is clearly maintained. |
Words & expressions
used are usually accurate and effective. The writing demonstrates competent
and generally consistent control of sentence structure, usage, and mechanics.
The letter and envelope contain few format errors and/or omissions. |
Clearly Meets the Acceptable Standard 3 |
The ideas are adequately
developed and organization of the topic is adequate. Some information is
given, and this information is supported by enough detail to fulfill the
purpose of the assignment. A tone appropriate for the addressee is generally
maintained. |
Words & expressions
used are generally accurate and occa9ionally effective. The writing
demonstrates basic control of sentence structure, usage, and mechanics.
Errors may occasionally impede meaning. The letter and envelope contain
occasional format errors and/or omissions. |
Does Not Clearly Meet the Acceptable
Standard 2 |
The ideas are poorly
developed and organization of the topic is ineffective. Information is
lacking. Supporting details are scant, insignificant, and/or irrelevant. The
purpose of the assignment is only partially fulfilled. A tone appropriate for
the addressee is evident but not maintained. |
Words and expressions
used are frequently inaccurate and/or misused. The writing demonstrates
faltering control of sentence structure, usage, and mechanics. Errors impede
meaning. The letter and envelope contain frequent format errors and/or
omissions. |
Clearly Below the Acceptable Standard 1 |
The ideas are not
developed and organization of the topic, if present, is inadequate.
Information is inappropriate and/or missing. The purpose of the assignment is
not fulfilled. Little awareness of tone appropriate for the addressee is
evident. |
Words and expressions are
inaccurate and/or misused. The writing demonstrates lack of control of
sentence structure, usage, and mechanics. Errors severely impede meaning. The
letter and envelope contain numerous and glaring format errors and/or
omissions. |
Insufficient INS |
The marker can discern no
evidence of an attempt to fulfill the assignment, or the writing is so
deficient in length that it is not possible to assess Content. |
The writing has been
awarded an INS for Content. |
Language Arts 9
Narrative/Essay Writing Rubric
FOCUS |
CONTENT Considers the reader;
establishes a purpose; chooses ideas; supports the response; stays on topic |
ORGANIZATION Demonstrates focus,
coherent order, connections between events and/or details, closure |
SENTENCE STRUCTURE Sentence structure is
controlled, sentence type and length is effective and varied. |
VOCABULARY Accuracy of words and
expressions; effectiveness of the words & expressions; appropriateness
& effectiveness of the writer's voice/tone |
CONVENTIONS Mechanics (spelling,
punctuation, capitalization, indentation) and Usage (subject-verb agreement,
pronoun-antecedent agreement); clarity & flow of the response |
Meets the Standard of Excellence 5 |
The writing captivates
& holds the reader's interest and is creative and/or original. The
writer's purpose is clear and sustained; the ideas used by the writer are
carefully chosen and perceptive. Supporting details are precise and often
creative. The writing is "on-topic" in that it directly addresses
the assignment throughout the response. |
The introduction is
purposeful and interesting, and it clearly establishes an appropriate focus
that is sustained. Events and/or details are arranged in paragraphs in a
purposeful and effective order, and coherence is maintained. Transitions,
either explicit or implicit, effectively connect events and/or details within
sentences and between paragraphs. Closure is effective and purposeful. |
Sentence structure is
effectively and consistently controlled. Sentence type and sentence length
are consistently effective and varied. Sentence beginnings are consistently
varied. |
Words and expressions are
used accurately and deliberately to fulfill the writer's purpose. Specific
words and expressions are used to create vivid images and/or enrich details.
The writer's voice/tone is confident and appropriate, and it enhances the
meaning. |
The quality of the
writing is enhanced because it is essentially error-free. The relative
absence of error is impressive considering the complexity of the response. |
Approaches the Standard of Excellence 4 |
The writing engages and
holds the reader's interest. The writer's purpose, whether stated or implied,
is clear and generally sustained. The ideas used by the writer are
thoughtful. Supporting details relevant and specific. The writing is
"on-topic" in that it directly addresses the assignment for most of
the response. |
The introduction is
purposeful, and it clearly establishes an appropriate focus that is generally
sustained. Events and/or details are arranged in paragraphs in a purposeful
order, and coherence is generally sustained. Transitions, either explicit or
implicit, appropriately connect events and/or details within sentences and
between paragraphs. Closure is appropriate and related to the focus. |
Sentence structure is
consistently controlled. Sentence type and length are usually effective and
varied. Sentence beginnings are often varied. |
Words and expressions are
often used accurately and effectively. Specific words and expressions show some
evidence of careful selection and some awareness of connotative effect. The
writer's voice/tone is clear and appropriate. |
The quality of the
writing is sustained because it contains only minor convention errors. Any
errors that are present do not reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of
the response. |
Clearly Meets the Acceptable Standard 3 |
The writing generally
holds the reader's interest. The writer's purpose, whether stated or implied,
is evident but may not be sustained. The ideas used by the writer are
appropriate but conventional. Supporting details are relevant but general.
The writing is "on-topic" in that it directly acknowledges the
assignment in some part of the response. |
The introduction is
functional, and it establishes a focus that may be inconsistently sustained.
Events and/or details are arranged in a discernible order, although coherence
may falter occasionally. Transitions tend to be mechanical and may be used
inconsistently within sentences and/or between paragraphs. Closure is related
to the focus but may be mechanical and/or artificial. |
Sentence structure is
generally controlled, but lapses may occasionally impede meaning. Sentence
type and sentence length are sometimes effective and/or varied. Some variety
of sentence beginnings is evident. |
Words and expressions are
generally used appropriately. General words and expressions are sometimes
used when specific words would be more effective. The writer's voice/tone is
discernible but may be inconsistent or uneven. |
The quality of the
writing is sustained through generally correct use of conventions. Errors
that are present may reduce the clarity or interrupt the flow of the
response. |
Does Not Clearly Meet the Acceptable Standard 2 |
The writing does not hold
the reader's interest. The writer's purpose, whether stated or implied, is
vague and not sustained. The ideas used by the writer are superficial.
Supporting details are scant and/or vague. The writing is
"off-topic" in that it only indirectly acknowledges the assignment
in a vague or ambiguous manner. |
The introduction may lack
purpose and/or may not be functional; any focus established by the writer may
not be sustained. The arrangement of events and/or details is not clearly
discernible, and coherence falters frequently. Transitions within sentences
and/or details ins not clearly discernible, and coherence falters frequently.
Transitions within sentences and/or between paragraphs are lacking or may be
inappropriate. Closure may be unrelated to the focus. |
Sentence structure often
lacks control, and this may impede the meaning. Sentence type and sentence
length are rarely effective or varied; run-on sentences and/or sentence
fragments, if present, often impede meaning. There is little variety of
sentence beginnings. |
Words and expressions are
generally used appropriately but may convey only vague meanings. General
words and expressions predominate; specific words, if present, may be
misused. The writer's voice/tone is not clearly established or is
inappropriate. |
The quality of the
writing is weakened by the frequently incorrect use of conventions. Errors
reduce the clarity and interrupt the flow of the response. |
Clearly Below the Acceptable Standard 1 |
The writing is confusing
and/or frustrating for the reader. The writer's purpose is not evident or is
very vague and not sustained. The ideas used by the writer are inappropriate
and/or insufficient. Supporting details are irrelevant, inappropriate, and/or
lacking. The writing is "off-topic" in that it does not respond to
the assignment at all. |
The introduction, if
present, is not functional or is inappropriate; no focus is established. The
arrangement of events and/or details is haphazard and incoherent. Transitions
are not used within sentences or between paragraphs. Closure is inappropriate
or missing. |
Sentence structure
generally lacks control, and this often impedes meaning. There is no
variation of sentence type or sentence length; run-on sentences and/or
sentence fragments, if present, severely impede meaning. There is no variety
of sentence beginnings. |
Words and expressions
convey only vague meanings. Words and expressions are frequently misused. The
writer's voice/tone is not evident. |
The quality of the
writing is limited by the consistently incorrect use of conventions. Errors
severely reduce the clarity and interrupt the flow of the response. |
Insufficient INS |
The writer has written so
little that it is not possible to assess Content. |
The writing has been
awarded and INS for content |
The writing has been
awarded and INS for content |
The writing has been
awarded and INS for content |
The writing has been
awarded and INS for content |